Same-sex union allowed because one was
born a man
Thursday, September 7, 2000
By MICHELE KURTZ
SAN ANTONIO, Texas -- Two Houston lesbians, hoping to
turn conventional Texas thinking on its head, obtained a marriage license
yesterday and will tie the knot next week. As in most states, Texas family law prohibits same-sex
marriages. These two women can legally get married, though, because one of
them was born a man.
An opinion last year by the state 4th Court of Appeals
in San Antonio said chromosomes -- not sex-change operations or outward
gender characteristics -- determine a person's gender.
In that case, the court invalidated the marriage of a
couple because it said the woman, who had been born a man but had undergone
a sex-change operation before the marriage, was still legally a man and
therefore not legally married.
That ruling worked in the favor of Jessica Wicks, 53,
and Robin Wicks, 44. They're thought to be the first couple living as the
same gender to be granted a marriage license in Texas.
It's not clear what impact the case might have on gay
rights issues in Texas, but many say it will likely call attention to
same-sex marriages and thorny questions about who determines a person's
gender -- and how.
"It points out, partially, how ridiculous all of
this is. Marriage is a private matter," said Dianne Hardy-Garcia,
executive director of the Lesbian/Gay Rights Lobby of Texas. "I don't
think the state has any business defining who should be able to get married
between consenting adults."
Rep. Arlene Wohlgemuth, R-Burleson, the president of
the Texas Conservative Coalition, said although the case is unusual, the
group does not oppose the Wicks' wedding even though both partners live as
women.
"We don't object to a marriage license being
issued since we do favor a marriage between a man and woman and this fits
the legal definition of gender," Wohlgemuth said. "They are
legally a man and a woman. What they do once they are married is up to
them."
But other issues complicate things, said Jack Sampson,
a University of Texas law professor. Not everyone is born with a set of
chromosomes, XX or XY, that clearly defines their gender. Hermaphrodites and
other cases of confused genetics could pose problems, he said.
In its opinion, the 4th Court of Appeals said the
Legislature is a better venue for deciding gender. And some advocates for
transsexuals say they'll ask lawmakers to do that next year.
Phyllis Randolph Frye, an attorney for the Wicks, said
yesterday she'll encourage other transsexuals to travel to San Antonio and
get married. She hopes such a groundswell would give traditional gay couples
ammunition to question why they can't be wed, too.
Frye also represents Christie Lee Littleton, who is
fighting the 4th Court of Appeals' ruling that came in her wrongful-death
lawsuit against a doctor who treated her husband, who died in 1996. The
court threw out the suit and Littleton's marriage because Littleton was a
male by birth.
The Texas Supreme Court has twice refused to hear the
case, which is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Wicks met about three years ago. Jessica was born
Grady Roland Wicks and has an "M" on her birth certificate. About
a year ago she took steps to legally become a woman, Frye said. News reports
have said Jessica has had a sex-change operation, but she and her attorney
refuse to confirm that. They say it is irrelevant because the 4th Court of
Appeals defines gender by chromosomes, not anatomy.
A few weeks ago, Robin changed her last name to Wicks.
The couple tried to get a marriage license in Houston but were refused when
the county clerk said Jessica was a woman. But Bexar County is one of 32
counties where transsexual couples could argue that the 4th Court's ruling
applies because the court covers those counties.
Yesterday, the Wicks clutched their newly acquired
marriage license and the office's standard lavender "newlywed
kit."
"We know we love each other, and in a real sense
we're already married in our heart," Jessica Wicks said. "But
there's something about the piece of paper that says this is the way it
should be."
Only Vermont, in response to a state supreme court
ruling, has legalized a sort of parallel marriage system for same-sex
couples. Seattle Post-Intelligencer
COX NEWS SERVICE
9/7/00
If you surfed in from the Internet
directly to this page
and wish to view the entire Christie Lee Littleton website,
click HERE
Last revised: Thursday, September 07, 2000 06:03 PM